كم الركبة الضاغط
وفر 24%! اشترِ كم الركبة الضاغط بسعر 198 د.ل فقط في ليبيا. متوفر حالياً، الدفع ع
🛒 تسوق الآن
Libya Press
Data centers consume 1.5% of global electricity. A radical new approach modeled on the human brain promises to slash that figure dramatically.
Artificial intelligence is devouring an ever-larger share of global electricity. The International Energy Agency estimates that data centers worldwide consumed approximately 460 terawatt-hours of electricity in 2024, a figure projected to exceed 1,000 TWh by 2026. Training a single large language model can emit over 500 tonnes of carbon dioxide. As AI adoption accelerates across every industry, the energy demands of conventional GPU-based computing are becoming unsustainable. Enterprise IT leaders are now facing a critical question: how do you scale AI without bankrupting your energy budget?
A federally funded research team at George Mason University is pursuing an answer that sounds almost too simple — build AI the way nature did. Working with collaborators at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Northwestern University, researchers Maryam Parsa and Giorgio Ascoli are developing a brain-inspired computing system that uses "spikes" — the brief, precisely timed electrical signals real neurons fire — instead of the continuous data streams that power today's AI. Parsa, an assistant professor in the College of Engineering and Computing, leads research in neuromorphic computing and hardware-software co-design. Ascoli, a professor of bioengineering and neuroscience, studies the computational principles of biological neural networks and applies them to designing more efficient AI systems.
Traditional deep neural networks rely on dense matrix multiplications performed continuously across millions or billions of parameters. Every operation consumes power regardless of whether meaningful computation is occurring. Spiking neural networks, or SNNs, operate fundamentally differently. Neurons in an SNN fire only when they receive sufficient input signals, making computation sparse and event-driven. This mirrors the biological brain, which achieves remarkable cognitive performance while consuming roughly 20 watts — less than a standard light bulb. The GMU team's approach spans both hardware and software, rethinking the entire computing stack from the ground up. The goal is to enable a new class of AI systems that are significantly more energy-efficient, adaptable, and inherently secure compared to today's state-of-the-art approaches.
Beyond energy efficiency, spike-based processing offers unexpected privacy benefits. Because SNNs operate with discrete, event-driven signals and temporal encoding, their outputs tend to be more variable and less tightly correlated with individual training samples. This weakens the signal that common privacy attacks rely on. In black-box settings where an attacker only has query access to the model, membership inference attacks show lower success rates compared to traditional neural networks. Model inversion attacks — which attempt to reconstruct training data by querying the model — also perform worse against SNNs because the combination of non-differentiable spike dynamics and temporally distributed decision boundaries makes it harder for attackers to train accurate surrogate models. Parsa emphasizes that spike-based systems should be viewed as a strong complementary layer for privacy, especially in edge and black-box deployment scenarios, but not a replacement for formal defenses like differential privacy.
A critical advantage of the GMU approach is its compatibility with existing semiconductor manufacturing. The team builds on a variant of spintronic devices closely related to industry-standard STT-MRAM, which is already commercially available from multiple foundries. Their collaborators have fabricated these devices in partnership with Western Digital, demonstrating that the technology fits within today's supply chain. This compatibility means enterprises would not need to wait for entirely new manufacturing infrastructure. The hardware is being designed with post-manufacturing debug and observability capabilities, allowing engineers to monitor internal states and spike activity at a low level.
The GMU team is careful to position neuromorphic computing not as a replacement for existing GPU-based deep learning systems but as a complementary paradigm. It is particularly well-suited for scenarios where efficiency, adaptability, and security are critical — edge computing, real-time inference, and privacy-sensitive applications. On the software side, the team is developing algorithms and tooling that make spike-based computation more interpretable and traceable than traditional deep neural networks. Unlike dense, opaque activations in conventional models, spiking systems operate through sparse, time-resolved events that can be instrumented and logged. While widespread enterprise deployment remains several years away, the convergence of DOE funding, university research, and industry-compatible hardware suggests that brain-inspired AI could move from laboratory to data center within the decade.