رقعة تصحيح أظافر القدم
وفر 31%! اشترِ رقعة تصحيح أظافر القدم بسعر 160.13 د.ل فقط في ليبيا. متوفر حالياً
🛒 تسوق الآنWhat If Haftar Never Intervened? Libya's 2026 Reality Without the Marshal
What If Haftar Never Intervened? Libya's 2026 Reality Without the Marshal
How Would Libya Look in 2026 if Khalifa Haftar Had Been Absent Since 2011?
As international efforts continue to end Libya's administrative division, a compelling question emerges: what if Khalifa Haftar had never risen to power after the 2011 revolution? Published by Libya Update on July 15, 2026, this counterfactual analysis challenges Libyans and observers alike to deconstruct the country's geopolitical landscape away from emotional narratives and entrenched loyalties.
Since the February 2011 revolution, Libya slipped into a security and institutional vacuum that nearly erased it from the map of functioning states. Into that void stepped Khalifa Haftar, a former CIA asset and Gaddafi-era officer who returned from exile in the United States to build the Libyan National Army and eventually control over three-quarters of the country.
Haftar's Rise: A Decade of Consolidation
Haftar's trajectory from Benghazi-based commander to de facto ruler of eastern Libya is well documented. By 2026, his grip extends from the Tunisian border in the west to the Egyptian frontier in the east. His sons Saddam and Belqasim now hold key military and economic positions, raising concerns about a hereditary succession — what analysts call the "Haftar dynasty."
The Guardian's March 2026 long read, "Power Without a Throne," detailed how Haftar runs Libya as a personal fiefdom, answerable to no elected body. Russia, the UAE, Egypt, and France have supported him at various stages, while Washington has maintained an ambiguous posture toward its former asset.
The Counterfactual: Libya Without Haftar
The question posed is stark: without Haftar's military intervention starting in 2014, would Libya have found a path to stability, or would the vacuum have been filled by even more fragmented militia rule?
Proponents argue the LNA provided a unifying force against Islamist militias in Benghazi and Derna, restoring a measure of security that enabled oil production to resume. The counterargument points to the 2020 ceasefire as evidence that political solutions are possible — but notes Haftar's rejection of the Government of National Unity has prolonged the division and deepened institutional fragmentation.
The Price of Division in 2026
Fifteen years after Gaddafi's fall, Libya remains a country of two governments, two central banks, and two competing visions of statehood. The administrative division costs Libyan taxpayers billions annually in duplicated institutions and lost economic synergy. Meanwhile, foreign powers continue to exploit the divide for strategic gain, each backing their preferred faction.
The African Union's repeated mediation efforts, the UN-facilitated 4+4 dialogue, and various Track II diplomatic initiatives represent persistent attempts to bridge the gap — but none have succeeded in dislodging the fundamental power structure that Haftar's rise created.
What the Data Reveals
Libya's current political outlook has been shaped decisively by Haftar's presence. Over the past two years, the LNA commander has focused on concentrating power around his family while solidifying a division of authority among his children. This dynastic turn makes a negotiated, unified future more difficult than ever.
The 2020 ceasefire ended large-scale fighting, but the underlying political deadlock remains unresolved. Foreign military presence continues, militia control persists in western Libya, and national elections remain indefinitely postponed. The "what if" question is not merely academic — it frames the fundamental choice Libyans face about what kind of state they want to build.
Beyond Counterfactuals: The Path Forward
While imagining a Libya without Haftar offers a useful intellectual exercise, any future political settlement must account for the structures he has built and the constituencies loyal to him. Mowafag Ragas, author of the original Libya Update analysis, suggests the real value of the counterfactual is not wishing away Haftar but clarifying what Libyans have lost in institutional development, national unity, and democratic possibility. The answer, he implies, is not about one man but about the collective choices — and failures — of the post-2011 era.
Libya's 2026 reality is what it is. But understanding the alternative paths not taken might illuminate the way forward for a country still searching for its post-revolution identity.
— Libya Press / News Desk
