كوب قهوة بغطاء
وفر 19%! اشترِ كوب قهوة بغطاء بسعر 219 د.ل فقط في ليبيا. متوفر حالياً، الدفع عند
🛒 تسوق الآنAl-Amin: UN Approach Aims to Improve Implementation of 6+6 Outcomes, Not Dismantle Them
Al-Amin: UN Approach Aims to Improve Implementation of 6+6 Outcomes, Not Dismantle Them
Libyan presidential candidate Fadil Al-Amin has affirmed that the current United Nations approach to Libya's political process is focused on improving the implementation of the 6+6 Committee's electoral outcomes, not dismantling or bypassing them. In a detailed post on his official Facebook page, Al-Amin stressed that the committee's outputs represent the most formal and legitimate political-legal framework reached between the House of Representatives and the High State Council regarding presidential and parliamentary election laws.
Main Facts and Key Details
The 6+6 Committee, composed of six members from each of Libya's two legislative bodies — the House of Representatives and the High State Council — was tasked with drafting electoral laws to pave the way for long-delayed national elections. Al-Amin emphasized that the significance of the committee's outputs extends beyond the legal texts themselves, encompassing the political and institutional considerations behind them. These outcomes emerged from direct negotiations between the two bodies that were granted roles in the political process through previous international agreements. The Security Council has treated the 6+6 outcomes as a foundational reference for the electoral path, welcoming them and referencing them in multiple UN briefings, statements, and resolutions — particularly in calls to build upon existing Libyan electoral laws and consensus agreements rather than bypassing or overturning them.
Reactions and Context
Al-Amin warned that completely bypassing the 6+6 outcomes would carry significant political and national risks, including the loss of the last remaining consensus base between the two legislative institutions, opening the door to challenges against the legitimacy of any new path, and reinforcing the notion that any political understanding can be demolished at any moment. He also cautioned that such a move could lead to accusations that the UN mission is overriding Libyan will or creating parallel bodies and tracks, deepening mistrust and uncertainty in any future political process. Meanwhile, a new round of UN-supervised talks between delegations from Libya's east and west began in Tunis earlier this month, with the UN mission describing the atmosphere as productive. The sessions concluded with an agreement to resume discussions in early June to address unresolved issues related to the constitutional and legal frameworks needed to hold general elections.
Challenges and Outlook
Al-Amin pointed to a recurring pattern in Libya's political landscape — numbered committees that repeat the cycle of dismantling existing understandings under the guise of development, where demolition prevails and genuine development is absent. He argued that the 6+6 outcomes have become an integral part of the political and legal structure of the Libyan crisis, and jumping over them would risk reproducing political chaos, perpetuating uncertainty, maintaining the status quo, and further delaying the national electoral process. The UN mission continues its efforts to revive the political process that has remained stalled since the postponement of the December 2021 elections, attempting to bridge the gap between the main parties and secure consensus over the rules of the electoral game — a key condition demanded by the international community to ensure acceptance of any future vote's results and restore lasting stability in the country.
The coming weeks will be critical as delegations prepare for the next round of talks in June, with the international community watching closely to see whether Libya's political actors can finally agree on a unified electoral framework that ends years of deadlock and paves the way for the long-awaited national elections.
