نظارات واقية للدراجات النارية
وفر 24%! اشترِ نظارات واقية للدراجات النارية بسعر 219 د.ل فقط في ليبيا. متوفر حا
🛒 تسوق الآن
Libya Press
When US President Donald Trump posted a list of world leaders involved in expanding the Abraham Accords, one name stood out — and another was conspicuously absent. Instead of naming Pakistan's elected Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, Trump named Field Marshal Asim Munir, the country's army chief. The omission was small, but its implications for Pakistan's power structure were enormous.
The post, shared across Trump's social media platforms, listed leaders from nations participating in the US-brokered Abraham Accords framework. For Pakistan, only Asim Munir appeared. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, the country's civilian head of government, was not mentioned at all.
Pakistan has experienced military rule for roughly half of its 78 years of independence. The army has directly governed the country through coups in 1958, 1977, and 1999, and has wielded behind-the-scenes influence during virtually every civilian administration.
Field Marshal Asim Munir assumed the role of Chief of Army Staff in November 2022. Since then, his influence over Pakistan's domestic and foreign policy has grown dramatically. He oversaw the crackdown following the May 2023 protests that led to the arrest of former Prime Minister Imran Khan and thousands of his supporters.
The US president's decision to name Munir rather than Sharif sends a powerful diplomatic signal. International observers note that when superpowers engage with Pakistan, they increasingly deal directly with military leadership rather than civilian government structures.
"This is not just a social media slip — it is a reflection of ground reality," said regional analysts following the posting. "The United States recognizes that strategic decisions about Pakistan's counterterrorism cooperation, nuclear posture, and regional diplomacy are ultimately made in General Headquarters, not in the Prime Minister's Office."
The power dynamics in Pakistan carry lessons for nations across the Middle East and North Africa, including Libya. Countries navigating post-conflict transitions must balance military institutions against civilian governance frameworks. When foreign powers engage selectively with military leaders over elected officials, it can undermine democratic transitions.
Libya's own experience with competing power centers — military factions in the east and Tripoli-based civilian authorities — illustrates how external recognition can shape domestic legitimacy. International acknowledgment of one authority over another has real consequences for governance and stability.
Sharif's government continues to manage day-to-day governance and economic policy, including negotiations with the International Monetary Fund. But the Trump post makes clear who the international community views as Pakistan's ultimate decision-maker. As Pakistan faces economic challenges and regional security threats, the military's grip on power shows no signs of loosening. For ordinary Pakistanis, the question of who truly governs their country appears to have been answered — not in Islamabad's parliament, but in Rawalpindi's General Headquarters.