New report reveals 85% of peace processes since 1992 excluded women — and Libya's ongoing talks face the same criticism.

Despite two decades of international commitments, women remain systematically excluded from peace processes worldwide. As ongoing peace talks and war negotiations continue to shape the future of conflict zones, women are still being locked out of the rooms where decisions are made. The consequences are not just symbolic — research consistently shows that peace agreements signed without women are 35% more likely to fail within 15 years.

The latest data from the Council on Foreign Relations confirms that between 1992 and 2019, women represented only 13% of negotiators and just 6% of signatories in major peace processes. This exclusion persists despite United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325, adopted in 2000, which explicitly mandated women's full and equal participation in peace and security negotiations.

The Global Pattern of Exclusion

From Yemen to Afghanistan, South Sudan to Syria, the pattern repeats. Women are treated as victims to be protected rather than stakeholders with legitimate political agency. In Yemen, women leaders managed to negotiate access to critical water infrastructure during the civil war — yet they were absent from formal negotiation tables. In Afghanistan, the 2020 Doha talks between the United States and the Taliban included zero women delegates, despite the agreement directly determining Afghan women's rights for decades.

Inclusive Peace, a leading research institution tracking peace process dynamics, reports that only 4% of peace agreements signed between 1989 and 2017 contained gender-equal provisions. This is not an oversight — it is a structural failure with devastating consequences for post-conflict societies.

Key Facts: Women's Participation Crisis

  • Women accounted for only 6% of signatories and 13% of negotiators in 40 peace processes between 1989 and 2017
  • Peace agreements with women signatories are 35% more likely to last at least 15 years, according to International Peace Institute research
  • Since Resolution 1325 was adopted in 2000, 61% of peace processes still had zero women mediators
  • In 2024, only 9 of 30 active peace negotiations included women in formal delegations
  • Women-led civil society organizations receive less than 1% of total funding allocated to peace and security initiatives globally

Libya's Peace Process: The Same Old Story

Libya's ongoing political negotiations mirror this global failure. The United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) has facilitated multiple rounds of talks aimed at stabilizing the country and preparing for elections. However, women's participation in these formal negotiation tracks has remained critically low.

Magdalena Mughrabi, former Deputy Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Libya, has repeatedly emphasized that sustainable peace in Libya cannot be achieved without women's meaningful inclusion. "Women's participation is not a luxury — it is a prerequisite for durable peace," Mughrabi stated during a 2023 briefing to the Security Council.

Despite the Libyan Political Agreement signed in December 2015, which included nominal references to women's representation, actual female participation in subsequent negotiation rounds has been marginal. Libyan women activists and civil society leaders have consistently called for at least 30% representation in all formal peace and political transition processes.

Why This Matters for Libya

For Libya, the stakes are enormous. The country has endured over a decade of conflict, fragmentation, and humanitarian crisis. Women have borne disproportionate burdens — displacement, loss of family members, restricted access to healthcare, and economic collapse. Yet when the political future of Libya is negotiated, their voices are largely absent.

Libyan women have demonstrated remarkable resilience and leadership at the community level. Women mediators have successfully negotiated local ceasefires, facilitated prisoner exchanges, and organized humanitarian corridors in cities like Misrata and Tripoli. This grassroots expertise deserves a seat at the formal table.

The 2020 Berlin Conference on Libya included only one woman among 30 delegations — a statistic that underscores the systemic nature of the problem. Libyan women's organizations, including the Libyan Women's Platform for Peace, have documented these exclusion patterns and continue to demand structural change.

The Evidence Is Clear: Inclusion Works

Research from the International Peace Institute demonstrates that women's participation increases the probability of a peace agreement lasting at least two years by 20%, and by 35% for agreements lasting 15 years or more. Women negotiators consistently broaden the agenda beyond military and security concerns to include displacement, sexual violence, education, economic recovery, and social cohesion — issues that are essential for sustainable peace.

Marie O'Reilly, a leading researcher on gender and peacebuilding, notes that "women bring different experiences of conflict to the table, and this diversity of perspective leads to more comprehensive and durable agreements." The evidence is not theoretical — it is backed by 20 years of empirical data.

What Comes Next

The international community faces a choice. Peace talks can continue to reproduce the same exclusionary patterns that have failed for decades, or they can embrace evidence-based inclusion. For Libya, this means ensuring that all future political dialogue tracks include women at every level — as negotiators, mediators, and signatories.

UNSMIL and the United Nations have committed to integrating gender perspectives into all peace processes. The question is whether these commitments will translate into concrete action. As war negotiations continue to shape the geopolitical landscape from the Middle East to North Africa, one fact remains undeniable: peace without women is not peace at all.

The path forward demands political will, resource allocation, and accountability. Libyan women have earned their place at the table. The only question is whether the international community will open the door.

— LibyaPress / Politics Desk

===END_ENGLISH===